In Cranmer’s time (1500’s) there was a huge debate as to who had ultimate authority: the ruler(s) of the country, or the leader(s) of the church (it would have been between the King, or the Pope)? In naming himself as head of the church, King Henry VIII explicitly stated, “I have the authority – no one else.” This is noted in Article 37, though it is tempered in differentiating between civil and ecclesiastical authorities. In these last articles, Cranmer was writing that people within the church are still subject to the laws of the land and cannot use their presence in Christ’s body to avoid those laws – if they do, they should expect the ramifications of their disobedience as citizens of that country. This means that we should be deliberate and take the consequences into account, for sometimes we do judge we need to follow God rather than society (as per Acts 5:29)!
+David